The state’s argument is that someone under 21 isn't of mental reasoning to own and purchase firearms. Yet the state says someone under the age of 21 is of mental reasoning to become an armed agent of the state and be entrusted with the legal authority to enforce law and detain someone, with deadly force if necessary.FfNJGTFO wrote: ↑Thu Feb 22, 2024 10:09 amBe ready to counter the argument that, "Not everything is doable at 18." You can't drink or buy alcoholic beverages at 18, you can't have a medical/dental license at 18, etc. etc. etc. Personally, I don't have a problem with 18+ folks owning guns and I thought it weird that there was that restriction. Even in the PRNJ, the restriction applied only to handguns when I was living there (maybe it's changed, now, dunno). But I'm sure the antis will counter with the "maturity" argument. Yes the person is of "legal age," but are they mature enough at that age to do everything?Miami_JBT wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2024 9:46 pm https://thecapitolist.com/house-judicia ... rules/amp/
https://floridaphoenix.com/2024/02/21/m ... ida-house/
The state’s argument collapses on that premise alone.
The antics can't counter that 19 year olds are given guns and the authority to use said guns against them in their own neighborhoods. They hate it when I bring that up.