N4KVE wrote: ↑Sun Dec 17, 2023 8:53 pm
“ATF has proposed a "rule change" to "clarify" what Congress meant by "engaged in the business" of selling firearms. If implemented and enforced as written, persons who sell a single gun (or even demonstrate a "willingness" to sell a gun) in a private transaction could be presumed to be "in the business" of selling firearms and be required to have an FFL. This is unadulterated horseshit, pure and simple”.
I asked the ATF guys at the WPB show yesterday if this was true. One guy laughed so hard I thought he was going to choke on his lunch. Like others have mentioned, he said it’s about the guys who sell “their personal collection” week after week year, after year. And if that was going to be what they are planning to do, why would he deny it? Wouldn’t he just say that’s how it’ll be in the future? GARY.
Oh, sure. And straw sales weren't about a guy who isn't a prohibited party having his nephew buy him a Glock on a law enforcement discount until it was.
I'm in the process of liquidating most of my private collection, and probably going to need a license to do it. Because it's just enough that I could be mistaken for a guy who's trying to make a profit.
N4KVE wrote: ↑Sun Dec 17, 2023 8:53 pm
“ATF has proposed a "rule change" to "clarify" what Congress meant by "engaged in the business" of selling firearms. If implemented and enforced as written, persons who sell a single gun (or even demonstrate a "willingness" to sell a gun) in a private transaction could be presumed to be "in the business" of selling firearms and be required to have an FFL. This is unadulterated horseshit, pure and simple”.
I asked the ATF guys at the WPB show yesterday if this was true. One guy laughed so hard I thought he was going to choke on his lunch. Like others have mentioned, he said it’s about the guys who sell “their personal collection” week after week year, after year. And if that was going to be what they are planning to do, why would he deny it? Wouldn’t he just say that’s how it’ll be in the future? GARY.
Oh, sure. And straw sales weren't about a guy who isn't a prohibited party having his nephew buy him a Glock on a law enforcement discount until it was.
I'm in the process of liquidating most of my private collection, and probably going to need a license to do it. Because it's just enough that I could be mistaken for a guy who's trying to make a profit.
Sell everything for a .01 penny, and one item at total value?
50 losses and 1 major profit
N4KVE wrote: ↑Sun Dec 17, 2023 8:53 pm
“ATF has proposed a "rule change" to "clarify" what Congress meant by "engaged in the business" of selling firearms. If implemented and enforced as written, persons who sell a single gun (or even demonstrate a "willingness" to sell a gun) in a private transaction could be presumed to be "in the business" of selling firearms and be required to have an FFL. This is unadulterated horseshit, pure and simple”.
I asked the ATF guys at the WPB show yesterday if this was true. One guy laughed so hard I thought he was going to choke on his lunch. Like others have mentioned, he said it’s about the guys who sell “their personal collection” week after week year, after year. And if that was going to be what they are planning to do, why would he deny it? Wouldn’t he just say that’s how it’ll be in the future? GARY.
Oh, sure. And straw sales weren't about a guy who isn't a prohibited party having his nephew buy him a Glock on a law enforcement discount until it was.
I'm in the process of liquidating most of my private collection, and probably going to need a license to do it. Because it's just enough that I could be mistaken for a guy who's trying to make a profit.
Sell everything for a .01 penny, and one item at total value?
50 losses and 1 major profit